Webster v. Shinn et al
| Jasper Ian Webster |
| David Shinn and Mark Brnovich |
| 3:2022cv08242 |
| December 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John Z Boyle (PS) |
| James A Teilborg |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's Order filed January 23, 2023, Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is denied. Petitioner to take nothing and this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. (CLM) |
Filing 3
ORDER: Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1 ) and this action are dismissed without prejudice, and the Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. See Order for further information. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 1/20/2023. (CLM)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAS) |
| Filing 1 PETITION (Titled Successive Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus) for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254). Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 200003924 filed by Jasper Ian Webster. (17 pages)(BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
