Valentine v. United Healthcare
Plaintiff: Michelle Lee Valentine
Defendant: United Healthcare
Case Number: 3:2023cv08025
Filed: February 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Steven P Logan
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. IT IS ORDERED the Joint Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #14 ) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any pending motions are denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice in its entirety and the Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 3/3/23. (MJW)
March 3, 2023 Filing 14 Joint MOTION to Dismiss Case by United Healthcare. (Ryden, Monica)
February 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED the parties shall file a joint statement no later than March 3, 2023, addressing whether the amended complaint cures the defects alleged in the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #9 ). Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 2/24/23. (MJW)
February 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until March 24, 2023 to file a response to the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #9 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant(s) shall file any reply within fifteen (15) days from the date Plaintiff's response is filed. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 2/22/23. (MJW)
February 22, 2023 Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against United Healthcare filed by Michelle Lee Valentine. (9 Pages)(REK)
February 17, 2023 Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by United Healthcare. (Ryden, Monica)
February 16, 2023 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Case , MOTION to Compel Arbitration by United Healthcare. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Ryden, Monica)
February 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Stipulation For Extension of Time To Answer Complaint : Defendant shall have until February 16, 2023, to file an answer to the Complaint and otherwise respond as provided by Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 2/10/23. (MJW)
February 9, 2023 Filing 7 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by United Healthcare. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ryden, Monica)
February 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 2/3/23. (MJW)
February 3, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to United Healthcare. (JAM)
February 3, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (JAM)
February 2, 2023 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21561609. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-8025-PCT-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (JAM)
February 2, 2023 Filing 2 VERIFICATION of Monica M. Ryden by United Healthcare re: Exhibit A to the #1 Notice of Removal. (JAM)
February 2, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Coconino County Superior Court, case number CV2022-00626. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21561609 filed by United Healthcare. (Ryden, Monica) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(JAM)
February 2, 2023 **STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED** SERVICE EXECUTED : Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint and Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon United Healthcare on 1/3/23. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 1/11/23.) (JAM) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Valentine v. United Healthcare
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Lee Valentine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Healthcare
Represented By: Monica Marie Ryden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?