Duthorn v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Samuel John Duthorn |
Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
3:2023cv08045 |
March 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Susan M Brnovich |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Certified Copy of Administrative Transcript filed by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Transcript Index, #3 Admin Process, #4 Payment, #5 Jurisdictional Part 1, #6 Jurisdictional Part 2, #7 Non Disability, #8 Disability, #9 Medical Records Part 1, #10 Medical Records Part 2)(Triesch, Heidi) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Heidi Triesch appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Triesch, Heidi) |
Filing 5 NOTICE: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summons shall issue. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 4 ORDER that the #2 application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, without prepayment of costs or fees or the necessity of giving security therefore is granted. Plaintiff shall be responsible for service by waiver or of the summons and complaint. IT IS ORDERED the Opening Brief is due within 60 days after the answer is filed; Answering Brief due within 30 days after service of Plaintiff's opening brief; Reply Brief due within 15 days after service of Defendant's brief. See attached order for complete details. Signed by Judge Susan M. Brnovich on 32023. (ESG) |
Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan M Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-08045-PCT-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAC) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Samuel John Duthorn. (Goodman, Jodiane) (BAC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Samuel John Duthorn. (Goodman, Jodiane) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Duthorn v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Samuel John Duthorn | |
Represented By: | Jodiane Goodman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Heidi Triesch |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.