Calderon v. USA
| Jaime Calderon, Jaime Rene Calderon and Jaime Arredonde |
| USA |
| 3:2023cv08071 |
| April 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Steven P Logan |
| James F Metcalf |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER - Movant's Motion to Extend re Supplement (Doc. #3 ) is DENIED. Respondent's Motion to Extend (Doc. #7 ) is GRANTED to the extent of the relief provided herein. The deadline for a response to the Motion to Vacate (Doc. #1 ) is VACATED, to be reset by further order. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge James F Metcalf on 5/31/2023. (WLP)
|
| Filing 11 SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT re: #1 MOTION to Vacate by Petitioner Jaime Calderon. (3 pages) (WLP) Modified to correct link on 6/1/2023 (WLP). |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Jaime Calderon re: #1 MOTION to Vacate by Petitioner Jaime Calderon. (3 pages) (WLP) Modified to correct link on 6/1/2023 (WLP). |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Jaime Calderon. (6 pages) (WLP) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time To File 2255 Response by USA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Crowley, Jason) |
| Filing 6 MOTION For Order To Declare Attorney Client Privilege Waived by USA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Crowley, Jason) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER - This matter was recently assigned to the undersigned for preparation of a report and recommendation. To facilitate the resolution of this matter, the Court will adopt a schedule and make orders concerning the filings in this matter. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge James F Metcalf on 4/24/2023. (WLP)
|
|
Filing 4
Service Order (2255) - The Clerk of Court must electronically serve a copy of the 2255 Motion (Doc. #1 in CV 23-08071-PCT-SPL (JFM)) and this Order on the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, and the Memorandum of Understanding between the United States District Clerk of Court for the District of Arizona and the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Arizona. The parties and the Clerk of Court must file all documents related to the 2255 Motion in the civil case. The United States Attorney for the District of Arizona or his designee has 60 days from the date of service within which to answer the 2255 Motion. The United States Attorney or his designee must not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer. Movant may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer to the 2255 Motion. The matter is referred to Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 4/21/2023. (Attachments: #1 2255 Motion)(WLP)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Supplement on Memorandum and Affidavit re: #1 Motion to Vacate by Jaime Calderon. (3 pages) (WLP) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (HLA) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) re: Criminal Case No CR-18-8126-PCT-SPL filed by Jaime Calderon. (128 pages plus enevelope). (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(HLA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
