Whitely v. Arizona Department of Corrections
Plaintiff: Bridget Whitely
Defendant: Arizona Department of Corrections
Case Number: 3:2023cv08124
Filed: July 7, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Dominic W Lanza
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003 Job Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's unopposed motion (Doc. #8 ) is granted. The deadline for Defendant to respond to the complaint is extended to September 15, 2023. Ordered by Judge Dominic W Lanza.(SLQ)(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)
August 30, 2023 Filing 8 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by Arizona Department of Corrections. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McKay, Neil)
August 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's unopposed motion (Doc. #6 ) is granted. The deadline for Defendant to respond to the complaint is extended to September 1, 2023. Ordered by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 8/3/23. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAW)
August 2, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by Arizona Department of Corrections. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McKay, Neil)
July 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PRELIMINARY ORDER: IT IS ORDERED: 1. That Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order on Defendant(s) and file a notice of service with the Clerk of Court; 2. That, unless the Court orders otherwise, on October 6, 2023, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 7/11/23. (MAW)
July 7, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Arizona Department of Corrections. (SCA). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
July 7, 2023 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22078887. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W. Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-8124-PCT-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SCA)
July 7, 2023 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Bridget Whitely. (Brown, Thomas) (SCA)
July 7, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-22078887 filed by Bridget Whitely. (Brown, Thomas) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SCA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whitely v. Arizona Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bridget Whitely
Represented By: Thomas Leon Brown, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona Department of Corrections
Represented By: Neil Todd McKay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?