Halterman #289633 v. Thornell et al
Petitioner: Jerad Lee Halterman
Respondent: Ryan F Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Case Number: 3:2023cv08615
Filed: November 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Alison S Bachus (PS)
Referring Judge: Alison S Bachus
2 Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2024 Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) by Jerad Lee Halterman. (1 Page) (CSL)
January 8, 2024 Filing 12 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) by Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Ryan F Thornell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Exhibit T, #2 Exhibit Exhibit U - Exhibit W p.1, #3 Exhibit Exhibit W p.2, #4 Exhibit Exhibit W p.3 - Exhibit X p.1, #5 Exhibit Exhibit X p.2 - Exhibit GG, #6 Exhibit Exhibit HH - Exhibit LL p.1, #7 Exhibit Exhibit LL p.2, #8 Exhibit Exhibit LL p.3 -Exhibit MM p.1, #9 Exhibit Exhibit MM p.2, #10 Exhibit Exhibit MM p.3 - Exhibit NN)(Smith, Joshua)
January 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: As the Court referenced in its December 6, 2023 Order, the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases apply in this matter. (Doc. #5 .) The parties are also governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Rules of Practice before the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona ("Local Rules"). The Court will consider this matter when the issues before it are fully briefed. Thus, after the Petition has been fully briefed per the Court's December 6, 2023 Order (or the time for full briefing has expired, whichever comes first), the Court will issue a Report and Recommendation addressing both the fully briefed Petition (Doc. #1 ) and Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #8 ). See document for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alison S Bachus on 1/4/2024. (CSL)
January 2, 2024 Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #8 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Jerad Lee Halterman. (5 Pages) (CSL)
December 22, 2023 Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re: #8 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Ryan F Thornell. (Smith, Joshua)
December 21, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Jerad Lee Halterman. (11 Pages) (CSL)
December 11, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua Cannon Smith on behalf of Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Ryan F Thornell. (Smith, Joshua)
December 11, 2023 Filing 6 Notice of Receipt of Electronic Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Arizona Attorney General on 12/06/2023. The Attorney General's Office will file a Notice of Appearance within five (5) business days that identifies the respondents that are represented or, in the alternative, will notify the Court if the Attorney General is not able to accept service for and/or represent any of the named respondents. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (Nielsen, Jim)
December 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Arizona Attorney General Service Order (2254): Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 is granted. The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Petition #1 and this Order on the Respondent(s) and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by electronic mail pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Alison S. Bachus pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 12/6/23. (Attachments: #1 Copy of Petition)(KLG)
November 28, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (CSL)
November 27, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (CSL)
November 27, 2023 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jerad Lee Halterman. (2 Pages) (CSL)
November 27, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Jerad Lee Halterman. (28 Pages) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-4)(CSL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Halterman #289633 v. Thornell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jerad Lee Halterman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ryan F Thornell
Represented By: Joshua Cannon Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Represented By: Joshua Cannon Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?