Enriquez v. 10 Roads Express LLC et al
| William Enriquez |
| 10 Roads Express LLC and Unknown Parties |
| 3:2024cv08011 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Camille D Bibles |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by 10 Roads Express LLC. (Guzman, Jamie) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to 10 Roads Express LLC. (RMW) |
Filing 13
*ORDER that Defendant shall have until 4/1/24, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Camille D. Bibles on 3/1/24. (NKS) *Modified on 3/5/2024 - NEF regenerated to Defendants only (RMW).
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION re: #1 Complaint [Stipulation to Extend Deadline for Defendant to File Responsive Pleading] by 10 Roads Express LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Guzman, Jamie) |
| Filing 11 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by William Enriquez: Affidavit of Service re: Complaint, Summons, Consent to Exercise of Jurisdiction by Magistrate upon 10 Roads Express, LLC on 02/09/2024. (Cowan, Barbara) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER: That the Order to Show Cause Hearing scheduled for February 26, 2024 is VACATED. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 9 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER that William Enriquez show cause for failure to comply with LRCiv 3.7(b) before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. Show Cause Hearing set for 2/26/2024 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. (Attachments: #1 Instructions, #2 Consent Form)(MAP)
|
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Jonathon Cherne on behalf of Plaintiff William Enriquez. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to 10 Roads Express LLC. (DXD). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Camille D Bibles on 1/17/24. (DXD)
|
| Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Camille D Bibles. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-08011-PCT-CDB. Magistrate Election form attached. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form)(REK) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by William Enriquez. (submitted by Barbara Cowan) (REK) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by William Enriquez. (submitted by Barbara Cowan) (REK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by William Enriquez. (submitted by Barbara Cowan) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
