Boyd v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Eric Boyd |
Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
3:2024cv08036 |
February 23, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
John Z Boyle |
Michael T Liburdi |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge Michael T Liburdi. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-24-8036-PCT-MTL. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 8 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Edmund Jack Darcher on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Darcher, Edmund) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Lawrence David Rohlfing on behalf of Plaintiff Eric Boyd. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 5 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: See document for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 2/26/24. (EJA) |
Filing 4 NOTICE: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summons shall issue. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22781368. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John Z Boyle. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-08036-PCT-JZB. Magistrate Election form attached. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form)(REK) |
Filing 2 NOTICE/Certification of Interested Parties by Eric Boyd. (submitted by Lawrence Rohlfing) (REK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-22781368 filed by Eric Boyd. (submitted by Lawrence Rohlfing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Boyd v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Eric Boyd | |
Represented By: | Lawrence David Rohlfing |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Edmund Jack Darcher |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.