Drew v. Equity Lifestyle Properties et al
| Corey Drew |
| Equity Lifestyle Properties, Thousand Trails, MHC Property Management, Ralph Kim Baker, Steve Bartle, Dina Harbin, Scott Woolley and Scott Wooley |
| 3:2024cv08050 |
| March 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michael T Morrissey (PS) |
| Steven P Logan |
| Michael T Morrissey |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER that Plaintiff shall have until June 7, 2024, to file a response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss #9 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file a reply within 15 days from the date Plaintiff's response is filed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion shall be deemed ready for decision without oral argument on the day following the date set for filing a reply unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T Morrissey on 5/10/2024. (KLG)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Ralph Kim Baker, Steve Bartle, Equity Lifestyle Properties, Dina Harbin, MHC Property Management, Thousand Trails, Scott Woolley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A and B)(Timchak, David) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Ralph Kim Baker, Steve Bartle, Equity Lifestyle Properties, Dina Harbin, MHC Property Management, Thousand Trails, Scott Woolley. (KLG). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #3 Motion to Allow Electronic Filing. The party is required to complete the Electronic Case File Registration form to register as a user with the Clerk's Office and to register as a subscriber to PACER (Public Access to Electronic Records) within five (5) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff must either serve each Defendant or seek a waiver of service for each Defendant. If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint or within 60 days of the filing of this Order, whichever is later, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Michael T. Morrissey pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 4/2/2024. (KLG)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAS) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Submitted by Corey Drew. (BAS) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney by Corey Drew. (5 pages) (BAS) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Corey Drew. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (2 pages) (BAS) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number 200011182 filed by Corey Drew. (36 pages) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
