Drew v. Yavapai, County of et al
| Corey Drew |
| Yavapai, County of, Yavapai County Sheriff's Office, Dennis M McGrane, Tom Boelts, John Johnson, Samuel Contreras, Patrick Boehm and Larry Hooten |
| 3:2024cv08073 |
| April 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michael T Morrissey (PS) |
| Steven P Logan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAS) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Submitted by Corey Drew. (7 pages) (BAS) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney by Corey Drew. (7 pages) (BAS) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Corey Drew. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (BAS) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number 200011668 filed by Corey Drew. (46 pages)(BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
