Howard et al v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Richard Shorty, Marie Howard and Lilly Wilson |
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation |
3:2024cv08095 |
May 16, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
Eileen S Willett |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
25 U.S.C. ยง 640 Indian Tribal Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(REK) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-23056885. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Eileen S Willett. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-08095-PCT-ESW. Magistrate Election form attached. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form)(REK) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Marie Howard, Richard Shorty, Lilly Wilson. (submitted by Susan Eastman) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(REK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $405.00, receipt number AAZDC-23056885 filed by Lilly Wilson, Richard Shorty, Marie Howard. (submitted by Susan Eastman) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.