Vasquez v. Rhodes
| Jose Francesco Vasquez |
| David Rhodes |
| 3:2026cv08099 |
| May 4, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| James F Metcalf (PS) |
| Michael T Liburdi |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 USCA Case Number re: #8 Notice of Appeal. Case number 26-3789, Ninth Circuit. (DXD) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Allow Electronic Filing. The party is required to complete the Electronic Case File Registration form to register as a user with the Clerk's Office and to register as a subscriber to PACER (Public Access to Electronic Records) within five (5) days of the date of this Order. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 5/29/26. (DXD)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEAL to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals re: #5 Order, #6 Clerks Judgment by Jose Francesco Vasquez (1 page). (DXD) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney by Jose Francesco Vasquez (2 pages). (DXD) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's Order filed May 15, 2026, Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 and this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. (DXD) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER - The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1 ) and this case are dismissed without prejudice. Petitioner's Emergency Motion to Stay (Doc. #2 ) is denied as moot. The Clerk must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 5/15/26. (DXD)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (DXD) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (Attachments: #1 Instructions) (DXD) |
| Filing 2 Emergency MOTION to Stay by Jose Francesco Vasquez (20 pages). (DXD) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241). Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 200021800 filed by Jose Francesco Vasquez (50 pages). (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DXD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vasquez v. Rhodes | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jose Francesco Vasquez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: David Rhodes | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
