Harris et al v. Cochise County, et al
| Maria Harris and Glenn Harris |
| Cochise County, Diane Carper, John Doe Carper, Brian Oertel and Jane Doe Oertel |
| 4:2008cv00008 |
| January 2, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| Cindy K Jorgenson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
171
ORDERED Plas' Motion for Reconsideration 163 is GRANTED IN PART. Dft's Motion for Reconsideration 162 is DENIED. The Court's 9/30/09, Order awarding summary judgment in favor of Cochise County and against Harris on Ct 2 & 3 are VACATED. The Joint Proposed Pretrial Order and any Motions in Limine shall be filed on or bfr 4/9/10. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 3/12/10.(SGG)
|
|
Filing
165
ORDER Denying in Part, 163 Motion for Reconsideration. Parties shall file any responses to the Motions for Reconsideration by 11/16/09. Parties shall file any replies by 11/30/09. Joint Proposed Pretrial Order, including Motions in Limine, to be filed 10 judicial days after the Court issues final ruling on the pending Motions for Reconsideration. ***SEE ATTACHED PDF FOR COMPLETE INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 10/30/09.(LSI, ) Modified on 11/2/2009 (BAR, TO DESIGNATE AS WRITTEN OPINION).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
