Perez v. Schriro

Petitioner: Robert Perez
Respondent: Dora Schriro
Case Number: 4:2008cv00332
Filed: May 30, 2008
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Pima
Referring Judge: Pro Se (Tucson)
Presiding Judge: John M Roll
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 15, 2011 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Robert Perez. This action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. It is further that Petitioner is GRANTED a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge A Wallace Tashima on 09/15/11. (LMF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perez v. Schriro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dora Schriro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?