Heredia-Oliva v. USA

Petitioner: Abraham Heredia-Oliva
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 4:2008cv00341
Filed: June 4, 2008
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: Stephen M McNamee
Referring Judge: Pro Se (Tucson)
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 23, 2008 2 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER; Movant's 8/4/08 Letter is denied; Movant's 8/25/08 Letter is granted to the extent this Order provides Movant with the status of this closed case, the criminal case and the civil action must remain closed, re: letters filed in CR 07-544-TUC-SMM. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 9/17/08. (REW, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Heredia-Oliva v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Abraham Heredia-Oliva
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?