La Quinta Worldwide, LLC v. Q.R.T.M., S.A. de C.V.

Plaintiff: La Quinta Worldwide, LLC
Defendant: Q.R.T.M., S.A. de C.V.
Case Number: 4:2009cv00175
Filed: March 27, 2009
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Maricopa
0 Judge:
Presiding Judge: Raner C Collins
Referring Judge: Pro Se (Tucson)
Nature of Suit: Property Rights: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 20, 2010 91 Opinion or Order of the Court AMENDED ORDER SETTING ORAL ARGUMENT re 65 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 67 MOTION for Summary Judgment. IT IS ORDERED that oral arguments on the aforementioned motion shall be held on 1/24/11 @ 2:30pm, before Judge Raner C Collins. Signed by Judge Raner C Collins on 12/20/10. (BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: La Quinta Worldwide, LLC v. Q.R.T.M., S.A. de C.V.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: La Quinta Worldwide, LLC
Represented By: Kate Elizabeth Frenzinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Q.R.T.M., S.A. de C.V.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?