Bormann v. Waxie Enterprises, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Bormann v. Waxie Enterprises, Inc.

Bormann v. Waxie Enterprises, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Deborah Bormann
Defendant:	Waxie Enterprises, Inc.
Case Number:	4:2009cv00264
Filed:	May 8, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Tucson Division Office
County:	Pima
Presiding Judge:	Frank R Zapata
Presiding Judge:	Glenda E Edmonds
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 31, 2010	Filing 18 ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Edmond's Report and Recommendation 13 is hereby ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law by this Court. ORDERED Dft's Petiton to Compel Arbitration 6 is GRANTED in part, with the provisions restricting puntive damages, award of atty's costs and fees, and the choice of venue hereby voided in accordance with the Report and Recommendation. That is action is dismissed. ORDERED that the Clk of the Ct enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Frank R Zapata on 3/31/10.(SGG)
July 8, 2009	Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration : Recommending that the District Court, enter an order GRANTING IN PART Motion to Compel Arbitration. The motion to compel should be granted, but the provision in the arbitration agreement restricting punitive damages, the provision restricting the award of attorneys costs and fees, and the choice of venue provision should be voided as substantively unconscionable. The action should be dismissed. SEE ATTACHED PDF FOR COMPLETE INFORMATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Glenda E Edmonds on 7/8/09. (LSI, )

Date Filed

Document Text

March 31, 2010

Filing 18 ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Edmond's Report and Recommendation 13 is hereby ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law by this Court. ORDERED Dft's Petiton to Compel Arbitration 6 is GRANTED in part, with the provisions restricting puntive damages, award of atty's costs and fees, and the choice of venue hereby voided in accordance with the Report and Recommendation. That is action is dismissed. ORDERED that the Clk of the Ct enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Frank R Zapata on 3/31/10.(SGG)

July 8, 2009

Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration : Recommending that the District Court, enter an order GRANTING IN PART Motion to Compel Arbitration. The motion to compel should be granted, but the provision in the arbitration agreement restricting punitive damages, the provision restricting the award of attorneys costs and fees, and the choice of venue provision should be voided as substantively unconscionable. The action should be dismissed. **SEE ATTACHED PDF FOR COMPLETE INFORMATION**. Signed by Magistrate Judge Glenda E Edmonds on 7/8/09. (LSI, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bormann v. Waxie Enterprises, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deborah Bormann
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Waxie Enterprises, Inc.
Represented By:	Patrick Thomas Stanley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?