Leggins v. Duncan
Michael V Leggins |
David Duncan |
4:2009cv00362 |
June 29, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Tucson Division Office |
Graham |
Cindy K Jorgenson |
Charles R Pyle (PS) |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER ADOPTING 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is DENIED; Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability; Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close its file in this matter. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 11/23/10.(BAC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Leggins v. Duncan | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Michael V Leggins | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: David Duncan | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.