Stafford v. Ryan et al
Warren Frank Stafford |
Charles L. Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
4:2009cv00363 |
June 29, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Tucson Division Office |
Pima |
David C Bury |
Glenda E Edmonds (PS) |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 27 Report and Recommendations. the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A Final Judgment shall enter separately. Signed by Judge David C Bury on 10/30/12. (LMF) |
Filing 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Magistrate judge recommends that the District Court enter an order denying the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on the merits filed by Warren Frank Stafford. The parties may serve and file written objections w ithin 14 days of being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. If objections are not timely filed, they may be deemed waived. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this report and recommendation to the petitioner and the respondents (see attached PDF for more information). Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 10/9/2012. (MFR) |
Filing 16 ORDER adopting 14 Report and Recommendations. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and dismissed as time-barred. Certificate of Appealability is denied. Signed by Judge David C Bury on 5/25/10.(SSU) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.