Valencia v. Ryan

Petitioner: Renie Varela Valencia
Respondent: Charles Ryan
Case Number: 4:2009cv00574
Filed: October 7, 2009
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Referring Judge: Hector C Estrada (PS)
Presiding Judge: Frank R Zapata
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 14, 2012 17 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 . The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 6) is denied. A certificate of appealability is denied. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 5/14/12. (See attached PDF for complete information.) (KAH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Valencia v. Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Renie Varela Valencia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Charles Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?