Bobbitt v. Milberg, LLP et al

Case Number: 4:2009cv00629
Filed: November 2, 2009
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
Presiding Judge: Frank R Zapata
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 23, 2010 68 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 61 Report and Recommendations. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 42) is DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiffs shall file their 3rd Amended Complaint no later than 2/11/2011.. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 12/23/2010. (KDT)
November 4, 2010 61 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 42 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Ronald Lehman, Brian C Ker, Janine L Pollack, Uitz & Associates, Michael C Spencer, John Gabroy, Milberg LLP, Lee A Weiss, Ronald A Uitz, Melvyn I Weiss, Gabroy Rollman & Bosse PC. Th e Magistrate Judge recommends the District Court, after its independent review of the record, enter an Order GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and dismissing Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint with leave to amend. ***SEE ATTACHED PDF ORDER FOR COMPLETE INFORMATION.***. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer C Guerin on 11/4/2010. (KDT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bobbitt v. Milberg, LLP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?