Jimenez v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP

Plaintiff: Maria Alicia Jimenez
Defendant: BAC Home Loans Servicing LP
Case Number: 4:2010cv00183
Filed: March 30, 2010
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Referring Judge: Charles R Pyle
Presiding Judge: Frank R Zapata
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 23, 2010 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 13 Report and Recommendations. Summarily granting 11 Motion for Judgment; granting 12 Motion to Dismiss; ***SEE ATTACHED PDF FOR FURTHER INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Frank R Zapata on 08/23/10.(LMF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jimenez v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Alicia Jimenez
Represented By: Barry Wayne Rorex
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BAC Home Loans Servicing LP
Represented By: Shayna Nicole Fernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?