Barron v. Winn

Petitioner: Roland R Barron
Respondent: Louis Winn
Case Number: 4:2010cv00399
Filed: June 30, 2010
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Referring Judge: D Thomas Ferraro
Presiding Judge: John M Roll
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 23, 2011 13 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 11 Report and Recommendations, The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 11) is adopted inwhole. The Petition (Doc. 1) is denied and this case is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge A Wallace Tashima on 3/18/11. (KAD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barron v. Winn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Roland R Barron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Louis Winn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?