Jones v. Sanan
Plaintiff: Darin Jones
Defendant: Abhay Sanan
Case Number: 4:2010cv00461
Filed: July 28, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Cindy K Jorgenson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER granting 32 Motion to Require Plaintiff to Compel or be Subject to Dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint. Plaintiff shall file and serve his preliminary expert affidavit on or before April 15, 2012. Should Plaintiff fail to timely file and serve his preliminary expert affidavit this case may be dismissed without further notice to Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on March 6, 2012.(BAR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Sanan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darin Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Abhay Sanan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?