Zandonatti v. MERS et al
| Christina Zandonatti |
| MERS, EMC Mortgage Corporation, Quality Loan Service Corporation, Red House Lending Incorporated and Unknown Parties |
| 4:2010cv00468 |
| August 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| Bernardo P Velasco |
| Banks and Banking |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER granting 25 Motion to Dismiss; granting 27 Motion to Dismiss; accepted and adopting in part Report and Recommendations re 34 Report and Recommendations. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file in this matter.. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 3/16/2012.(JKM)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER ADOPTING 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 17 Motion to Dismiss Party is GRANTED, 14 Motion for Ruling is GRANTED, 3 Motion to Dismiss Case is GRANTED, 15 Motion to Strike is DENIED AS MOOT, 9 Motion to Remand to State Court is DENIED. Clerk to dismiss Complaint, with leave to amend; plaintiff has 30 days to file an Amended Complaint. Clerk is directed to DISMISS all claims and close this case, if plaintiff fails to do so. Plaintiff shall not have any ex parte communications with this Court. This matter remains referred to Magistrate Judge Bernardo P. Velasco for all pretrial proceedings and Report and Recommendation. (See attached PDF for complete information). Signed by Judge David C Bury on 3/1/11. (BAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
