Farnsworth v. Graber

Petitioner: Richard B Farnsworth
Respondent: Conrad Graber
Case Number: 4:2010cv00533
Filed: August 31, 2010
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Graham
Referring Judge: Glenda E Edmonds (PS)
Presiding Judge: Frank R Zapata
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 3, 2011 16 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 15 Report and Recommendations. Petitioners §2241 habeas petition is denied. The motion to amend the petition is denied, and this case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this matter. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 06/02/11. (LMF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Farnsworth v. Graber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard B Farnsworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Conrad Graber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?