Montez v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Estevan Luis Duran Montez
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 4:2010cv00544
Filed: September 8, 2010
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Referring Judge: Jacqueline J Marshall
Presiding Judge: Frank R Zapata
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 26, 2013 27 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 24 . It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's claim for benefits is REMANDED to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration for an award of benefits in accordance with the Report and Recommendation. It is further ORDERED that judgment be entered accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 3/26/13. (See attached PDF for complete information.) (KAH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Montez v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By: Alexess Rea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Estevan Luis Duran Montez
Represented By: Ronald B Eskin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?