Fuchs v. University of Arizona
Plaintiff: Esther Fuchs
Defendant: University of Arizona
Case Number: 4:2010cv00606
Filed: October 6, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: David C Bury
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER denying 13 Motion for Reconsideration and Request for Reinstatement. Signed by Judge David C Bury on 1/25/11.(BAC)
December 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants Motion to Dismissis GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed on 12/17/10. (BAC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fuchs v. University of Arizona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: University of Arizona
Represented By: Michael King Goodwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Esther Fuchs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?