Castro v. Graber
Petitioner: Phillip A Castro
Respondent: Conrad M Graber
Case Number: 4:2010cv00616
Filed: October 13, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Graham
Presiding Judge: Raner C Collins
Presiding Judge: D Thomas Ferraro
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that 1 Petitioners Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court should enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge D Thomas Ferraro on 6/28/11.(BAC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Castro v. Graber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Phillip A Castro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Conrad M Graber
Represented By: John Reynolds Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?