Bradford v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Petitioner: Robert Bradford, Jr.
Respondent: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Case Number: 4:2010cv00751
Filed: December 14, 2010
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: Raner C Collins
Nature of Suit: Railway Labor Act
Cause of Action: 45:151
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 1, 2012 36 Opinion or Order of the Court *ORDER denying Plaintiff's 24 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting Respondent's 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of the Court shall dismiss the complaint and action with prejudice and enter judgment in favor of Union Pacific. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 6/1/12.(SMBE) Modified, changed defendant's to respondent's on 6/1/2012 (SMBE).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bradford v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert Bradford, Jr.
Represented By: Jeffrey Howard Jacobson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Represented By: Clifford Alan Godiner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?