JPMCC 2007-C1 Grasslawn Lodging LLC v. Dix et al
| JPMCC 2007-C1 Grasslawn Lodging LLC |
| Randal G Dix, Michael J Hanson and Christine Hanson |
| 4:2011cv00017 |
| January 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Cindy K Jorgenson |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER: Granting 29 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 36 Defendant's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff against Defendant Randal G. Dix. Plaintiff is awarded a total of $ ;307,173,991.57 in damages, plus accrued interest, late fees and other chargeable fees and costs, as set forth in the Loan Agreement, less any payments received in connection with this Loan from February 11, 2011 through the date of judgment. Post judgment interest shall be awarded at the federal judgment rate specified in 28 U.S.C. §1961(a)(1). Any and all requests for attorney's fees shall be made by motion in accordance with Rule 54(d)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P., and L.R.Civ.54.2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close its file in this matter. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 4/1/2013. (See attached PDF for complete information)(ALS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
