Thurman et al v. United States Internal Revenue Service
| George Otto Thurman and Elizabeth L Thurman |
| United States Internal Revenue Service |
| 4:2011cv00158 |
| March 16, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| D Thomas Ferraro |
| Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7426 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
IT IS ORDERED that after a full and independent review of the record, in respect to the Plaintiffs objections, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation Doc. 33 is accepted and adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Doc. 32 is GRANTED and the Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge David C Bury on 8/21/12.(KAD)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting 10 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; adopting Report and Recommendations re 25 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiffs have leave to file an Amended Complaint by 5/21/2012. The Clerk of the Court is directd to Dismiss al l claims and to close this case, if Plaintiffs fail to file the Amended Complaint by 5/21/2012. This matter remains referred to Magistrate Judge D. Thomas Ferraro. (See attached PDF for complete information).. Signed by Judge David C Bury on 4/30/2012.(JKM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
