Alenizi v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Mohamed Alenizi
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 4:2011cv00183
Filed: March 30, 2011
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Referring Judge: D Thomas Ferraro
Presiding Judge: Cindy K Jorgenson
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:1383
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 3, 2012 24 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Adopting 23 Report and Recommendations,. This case is remanded to the Commissioner with instructions as outlined in the Remedy section of the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk shall enter Judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 04/02/12. (LMF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alenizi v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mohamed Alenizi
Represented By: Brian I Clymer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By: Anthony J Navarro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?