Hughes v. Kisela
Plaintiff: Amy Hughes
Defendant: Andrew Kisela
Case Number: 4:2011cv00366
Filed: June 21, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: Frank R Zapata
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 20 *ORDER: IT IS ORDERED Defendants 6 Motion to dismiss the negligence claim, which has been converted to a motion for summary judgment, is GRANTED. Defendants 13 Motion for summary judgment on the civil rights claim is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 5/8/12.(BAC) *Modified to modify text on 5/8/2012 (BAC).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hughes v. Kisela
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Hughes
Represented By: Vernon Edward Peltz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Kisela
Represented By: Paul Correa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?