Shupe et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Richard Shupe and Maria Shupe |
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA |
4:2011cv00501 |
August 12, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Tucson Division Office |
Pima |
Raner C Collins |
Bernardo P Velasco |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 153 ORDER ACCEPTING and ADOPTING in part and REJECTING in part 140 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiffs 88 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED; Plaintiffs 96 Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED. Defendants 115 Motion for Summary Judg ment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: GRANTED as to Plaintiffs claims pursuant to the TCPA, A.R.S. § 44-1281, and harassment and intentional infliction of emotional distress; DENIED as to Plaintiffs claim for invasion of privacy. The Court rejects Magistrate Judge Velascos recommendation to remand this action to the state court. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over Plaintiffs invasion of privacy claim. Signed by Chief Judge Raner C Collins on 3/14/14.(BAC) |
Filing 28 ORDER ADOPTING 23 Report and Recommendations. Denying 6 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Maria Shupe, Richard Shupe, and Denying 4 Motion to Dismiss Case filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank NA. FURTHER ORDERED referring this matter back to Magistrate Judge Velasco for all pretrial proceedings and report and recommendation. Signed by Judge Raner C Collins on 4/18/12. (SMBE) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.