Williams v. Apker

Petitioner: Kendal Ray Williams
Respondent: Craig Apker
Case Number: 4:2011cv00755
Filed: November 23, 2011
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Referring Judge: Bernardo P Velasco (PS)
Presiding Judge: Frank R Zapata
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 4, 2012 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER accepting and adopting 13 Report and Recommendations. Petitioner's §2241 Habeas 1 Petition is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this matter. (see attached pdf for complete information) Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 9/4/2012. (GCP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Apker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kendal Ray Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Craig Apker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?