Valenzuela v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Rosemary Valenzuela
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 4:2011cv00812
Filed: December 16, 2011
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: Hector C Estrada
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 15, 2013 26 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that the Commissioner's final decision in this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Order. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to: Amend the docket to reflect that Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, has been substituted as the named Defendant in this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 25(d) and enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hector C Estrada on 3/15/2013. (MFR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Valenzuela v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rosemary Valenzuela
Represented By: Phillip B Verrette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?