Gonzalez v. USA

Petitioner: Juan Carlos Gonzalez
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 4:2011cv00841
Filed: December 27, 2011
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: David C Bury
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 23, 2012 8 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 6 Motion to Expand the Record filed in CV 11-841-TUC-DCB. Further ordered that Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence in CR 10-294-TUC-DCB and CV 11-841 TUC-DCB is denied. Further ordered that the civil case is dismissed with prejudice, Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment as to Juan Carlos Gonzalez (1). Signed by Judge David C Bury on March 22, 2012. (BAR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzalez v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Erica Leigh Seger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Juan Carlos Gonzalez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?