Richbourg et al v. Jimerson et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 2, 2013
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Defendants 78 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; Plaintiffs 97 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of the Statute of Limitations is DENIED; Plaintiffs 98 Motion for Summary Judgment on the Indispensable Party, Accord and Satisfaction, Warranty Contract, and Economic Loss Defenses is DENIED AS MOOT; Plaintiffs 115 Response to Defendants Supplemental Statement of Facts in Support of Reply in Support of Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment Re: Sta tute of Limitations and Motion to Strike Affidavit of Patrick Mehall and for Sanctions is DENIED AS MOOT; Defendants 119 Motion for Summary Judgment Re: Spoliation of Evidence is DENIED AS MOOT; Plaintiffs 122 Response to Defendants Controverting Statyment [sic] of Response to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment on the Indispensable Party, Accord and Satisfaction, Warranty Contract and Economic Loss Defenses and Motion to Strike Affidavit of Patrick Mehall and Motion for Sanctions is DENI ED AS MOOT; Plaintiffs 125 Motion to Strike Affidavits of Patrick Mehall and Bobby L. Jimerson is DENIED; Plaintiffs Counsels 126 Application of John MacMullin to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiffs is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close its file in this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald on 6/28/13.(BAC)
|September 24, 2012
ORDER DENYING 49 Plaintiffs Motion to Reconsider Order on Plaintiffs Second Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery Request number 1 and for Sanctions, and Motion to Continue the Deadlines. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall contact the law clerk for Judge Bruce G. Macdonald, by telephone regarding all discovery disputes and prior to the filing of any discovery-related motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald on 9/21/12.(BAC)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?