Mitchell v. Arizona, State of et al
| Jeffrey Lee Mitchell |
| Arizona, State of, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Assistant Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 4:2012cv00178 |
| March 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| Hector C Estrada (PS) |
| David C Bury |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER, it is ORDERED that the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 6 ) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernardo P Velasco on 10/6/14. (See attached PDF for complete information.) (KAH)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDERED (1) Ground One (a) and Grounds Two through Four are dismissed;(2) Respondents shall file a supplemental answer, addressing Ground One (b),within thirty days of the filing date of this order. (3) Petitioner may file a supplemental reply within thirty days from the date of service of the supplemental answer.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernardo P Velasco on 3/26/2014. (JKM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
