Starr v. Apker

Starr v. Apker

Petitioner:	David Evan Starr
Respondent:	Craig Apker
Case Number:	4:2012cv00225
Filed:	March 28, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Tucson Division Office
County:	Pima
Presiding Judge:	D Thomas Ferraro (PS)
Presiding Judge:	Raner C Collins
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 5, 2014	Filing 55 ORDER ADOPTING 45 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION as the findings of fact and conclusions of law by this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Petitioners 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED IN PART to the extent Petitioner be put on IFRP Exempt sta tus until a proper restitution schedule has been set by the sentencing court, and DENIED IN PART to the extent that Petitioner requests changes to the terms of his order of restitution. BOP shall stop collecting restitution payments from Petitioner, and shall place Petitioner on IFRP Exempt status. Respondents 29 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Petitioners 42 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED striking Doc. 54 from the record as an unpermitted reply. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly and shall close its file on this matter. Signed by Chief Judge Raner C Collins on 3/3/14.(BAC)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 5, 2014

Filing 55 ORDER ADOPTING 45 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION as the findings of fact and conclusions of law by this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Petitioners 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED IN PART to the extent Petitioner be put on IFRP Exempt sta tus until a proper restitution schedule has been set by the sentencing court, and DENIED IN PART to the extent that Petitioner requests changes to the terms of his order of restitution. BOP shall stop collecting restitution payments from Petitioner, and shall place Petitioner on IFRP Exempt status. Respondents 29 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Petitioners 42 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED striking Doc. 54 from the record as an unpermitted reply. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly and shall close its file on this matter. Signed by Chief Judge Raner C Collins on 3/3/14.(BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Starr v. Apker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: David Evan Starr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Craig Apker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?