Warren v. Apker
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 16, 2014
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 30 . It is ordered denying as moot 25 Motion that the District Court now reach the merits of this Habeas Corpus, denying 26 Motion for for Judicial Notice and Acknowledgement, denying 35 Motion for poly graph test, and denying as moot 39 Motion to Strike. Petitioner's §2241 Petition (Doc. 1 ) is denied and this case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file in this matter. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 5/15/14. (KAH)
|March 6, 2014
AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the District Judge deny Petitioner's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 1 ); deny as moot Petitioner' ;s Motion by Petitioner That This District Court Now Reach the Merits of This Habeas Corpus 28 U.S.C. 2241 Now Pending a District Court Decision for Twenty-Two Months Since Filed April 25, 2012 (Doc. 25 ); denying Petitioner's Motion for Judici al Notice and Acknowledgement (Doc. 26 ); and declining to issue a certificate of appealability. Reasonable jurists would not find the Court's ruling debatable. Any party may serve and file written objections within 14 days after being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. If objections are filed, the parties should use the following case number: CV-12-314-TUC-JGZ. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald on 3/6/14. (See attached PDF for complete information.) (KAH)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?