Pryor #235926 v. Ryan et al
| Oliver Michael Pryor |
| Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 4:2012cv00526 |
| July 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| Bruce G Macdonald (PS) |
| Jennifer G Zipps |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's 11 First Amended Petition Under 28 USC § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald on 12/19/16.(BAC)
|
|
Filing
26
AMENDED ORDER(Amended as to first line only): Petitioner's 11 First Amended Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. This matter is DISMISSED with prejudice and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close its file in this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald on 9/28/15.(BAC)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER: Petitioner's 11 First Amended Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. This matter is DISMISSED with prejudice and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close its file in this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald on 9/28/15.(BAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
