Solis Haro v. Ryan et al
||Eliseo Solis Haro
||Charles L Ryan, K Hartsuck, Unknown Rascon, E Caraveo and Unknown Parties
||August 15, 2012
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Tucson Division Office
||Pro Se (Tucson)
||Cindy K Jorgenson
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 25, 2015
ORDER granting 117 Motion for Summary Judgment and the action is terminated with prejudice. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 9/25/2015.(MFR)
|January 30, 2014
ORDER that the Objection to Court Order Denying Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 49 ) is treated as a Motion for Reconsideration and is DENIED. It is Ordered the Motion to Proceed with Summary Judgment as Timely (Doc. 43 ) is GRANTED. Rascon shall file his response to the Motion for Summary Judgment within 33 days of the date of this Order. It is further Ordered the Motion to Strike (Doc. 51 ) is DENIED, the Motion for Extension of Time to File Response (Doc. 53 ) is GRANTED IN PART, Th e Motion for Status (Doc. 57 ) is DENIED AS MOOT, and the Motion to Accept Late Filing (Doc. 60 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall docket the lodged response (Doc. 61 ) (see attached PDF for more information). Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 1/29/2014. (MFR)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?