Solis Haro v. Ryan et al
Eliseo Solis Haro |
Charles L Ryan, K Hartsuck, Unknown Rascon, E Caraveo and Unknown Parties |
4:2012cv00612 |
August 15, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Tucson Division Office |
Pima |
Pro Se (Tucson) |
Cindy K Jorgenson |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 134 ORDER granting 117 Motion for Summary Judgment and the action is terminated with prejudice. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 9/25/2015.(MFR) |
Filing 63 ORDER that the Objection to Court Order Denying Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 49 ) is treated as a Motion for Reconsideration and is DENIED. It is Ordered the Motion to Proceed with Summary Judgment as Timely (Doc. 43 ) is GRANTED. Rascon shall file his response to the Motion for Summary Judgment within 33 days of the date of this Order. It is further Ordered the Motion to Strike (Doc. 51 ) is DENIED, the Motion for Extension of Time to File Response (Doc. 53 ) is GRANTED IN PART, Th e Motion for Status (Doc. 57 ) is DENIED AS MOOT, and the Motion to Accept Late Filing (Doc. 60 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall docket the lodged response (Doc. 61 ) (see attached PDF for more information). Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 1/29/2014. (MFR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.