Arizona, State of v. International Boundary and Water Commission et al
| Arizona, State of |
| International Boundary and Water Commission and Edward Drusina |
| Nogales, City of |
| Edward Drusina and International Boundary and Water Commission |
| 4:2012cv00644 |
| June 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Frank R Zapata |
| Environmental Matters |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
202
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 198 . The City of Nogales' Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Count II of Third Party Plaintiff USIBWC's Third Party Claim (Doc. 166) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court to enter judgment in favor of the City of Nogales on Claims 1 and 2 of the Third-Party Complaint and dismiss the Third-Party Complaint (Doc. 5) with prejudice. USIBWC's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Liability on Count 9 of the State's Amended Complaint (Doc. 1 68) is GRANTED. Plaintiff State's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Count 9 (Doc. 170) is GRANTED. This matter is referred back to Magistrate Judge Ferraro for pretrial proceedings for purposes of conducting a status conference to determine w hether the parties seek to pursue a resolution regarding the injunctive relief and civil penalties sought in the First Amendment Complaint and any award of attorney's fees and costs. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 9/20/17. (See attached PDF for complete information.) (KAH)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 102 ) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law by this Court; accordingly IT IS ORDERED that the Amended Motion of the City of Nogales for Summary Judgment on Third Party Claim(Doc. 76 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The City of Nogales is entitled to summary judgment on the First Claim for Relief alleged in the Third-Party Complaint. The summary judgment is DENIED as to the Second Claim for Relief of the Third-Party Complaint. This case remains referred to Magistrate Judge Ferraro for pretrial proceedings. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 3/22/2016. (See attached PDF for complete information)(DLC)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 68 . Plaintiff State of Arizona's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment: Liability for counts 2, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 (Doc. 45 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff is GRANTED summary judgment as a matter of law as to Count Five of the First Amended Complaint and that summary judgment is DENIED as to Counts Eight and Nine based on the finding of a genuine issue of material fact. It is further ORDERED that Counts Tw o, Six and Seven are DISMISSED as moot and that this case remains referred to Magistrate Judge D. Thomas Ferraro for all pretrial proceedings and report and recommendation. All filings shall be designated: CV 12-644-TUC-FRZ(DTF). Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 9/30/15. (See attached PDF for complete information.) (KAH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
