Baron v. Huachuca City, Town of

Plaintiff: Lori Baron
Defendant: Huachuca City, Town of
Case Number: 4:2012cv00754
Filed: October 12, 2012
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Tucson Division Office
County: Cochise
Referring Judge: Leslie A Bowman
Presiding Judge: Raner C Collins
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 15, 2013 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 . It is further ordered that 3 Motion to Dismiss Case is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Raner C Collins on 3/15/13. (See attached PDF for complete information.) (KAH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baron v. Huachuca City, Town of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lori Baron
Represented By: Edward W Matchett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Huachuca City, Town of
Represented By: Justin Scott Pierce
Represented By: Victoria R Torrilhon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?