Bevel v. Ryan et al
| Gregory Allen Bevel |
| Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 4:2012cv00823 |
| November 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Hector C Estrada (PS) |
| Frank R Zapata |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING 14 Report and Recommendation, and DENYING 15 Motion for Certificate of Appealability filed by Gregory Allen Bevel. Petitioners §2254 habeas petition is denied and this case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file in this matter. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 5/9/14. (SMBE)
|
|
Filing
14
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254). The Magistrate Judge recommends that the District Court, after its independent review of the record, enter an order dismissing the petition for writ of habeas corpus. It is time-barred. Any party may serve and file written objections within 14 days of being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 4/10/14. (See attached PDF for complete information.) (KAH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
