United States of America v. 5.62 Acres of Land et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 29, 2016
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS ORDERED that the 114 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED IN PART AND REJECTED IN PART. The 122 Motion to Modify in Part and Adopt in Part shall be treated as an Objection and, accordingly, DENIED A S MOOT. Plaintiff's 71 Motion in Limine to Exclude After Sales and Listings is DENIED and individual listing evidence may not be presented to the jury, but Sanders may rely on this evidence to form his opinions. Plaintiff's 72 Motion in Limine to Exclude Lost Profits is GRANTED. Plaintiff's 73 Motion in Limine to Exclude Non-Compensable Severance Damages is DENIED. Plaintiff's 74 Motion in Limine to Exclude Impact Opinions of Defendants Experts Drake and Sanders is DE NIED. Defendant's 75 Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Baker and Alternatively his Non-expert Survey and Paired Sale Analysis of Cell Towers is DENIED, pursuant to the R&R. Defendant's 76 Motion in Limine to Exclude Any Evidence, Testimony or Argument Regarding Nominal Use is DENIED, pursuant to the R&R. Defendant's 77 Motion in Limine to Exclude any Evidence Testimony or Argument Regarding Title 8 U.S.C. § 1357 is DENIED, pursuant to the R&R. The motions to set hearings are GRANTED as follows: (Doc. 136): CV 13-198 TUC DCB; (Doc. 118): CV 13-441 TUC-DCB; (Doc. 112): CV 13-443 TUC-DCB, and (Doc. 92): CV 13-480-TUC DCB. Defendants Supplements are STRICKEN by granting the motions, as follows: (Doc. 135): CV 13-198 TUC DCB; (Doc. 115): CV 13-441 TUC DCB; (Doc. 111): CV 13-443 TUC DCB, and (Doc. 90): CV 13-480 TUC DCB. (See attached PDF for complete information). Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 4/29/16.(BAC)
|March 31, 2016
ORDER granting 129 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 3/31/16.
|September 25, 2015
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Magistrate Judge Macdonald's 89 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted. Plaintiff's 68 Motion for consolidation is denied. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 9/25/2015. (KEP)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?