Tripati v. Corizon, Inc. et al
| Anant Kumar Tripati |
| Corizon Incorporated, Dimitric Catsaros, Joseph Moyse, Unknown Party and Unknown Parties |
| 4:2013cv00615 |
| July 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Pima |
| Pro Se (Tucson) |
| David C Bury |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
324
ORDER denying 321 Motion for Discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff having failed, after repeated warnings,to file a Response, the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is taken under advisement pursuant to LRCIV. 7.2(i). Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 3/12/2019. (KEP)
|
|
Filing
316
ORDER that the Renewed Verified Motion for Limited Discovery (Doc. 312 ) is DENIED. It is further Ordered that the deadline for filing a Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is extended to 1/21/2019. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME SHALL BE GRANTED (see attached Order for complete details). Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 12/17/2018. (MFR)
|
|
Filing
306
ORDER that the Motion for Procedural Order (Doc. 295 ) is DENIED. It is further Ordered that the Motion to Seal (Doc. 297 ) is GRANTED for the Clerk of the Court to file the lodged Motion for Summary Judgment and Statement of Facts (Docs. 298 , [ 299]) UNDER SEAL. It is further Ordered that the Motion for Leave to file the Motion for Summary Judgment (lodged 298 ) in excess of the page limit (Doc. 300 ) is GRANTED. It is further Ordered that the Motion for Appointment of Expert (Doc. 301 ) is DENIED. It is further Ordered that the Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (Doc. 302 ) is DENIED (see attached Order for complete details). Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 11/20/2018. (MFR)
|
|
Filing
294
ORDER denying 289 Motion for Limited Discovery. It is further ordered that this matter shall not be stayed during the pendency of any interlocutory appeal related to the Petition for Mandamus. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 11/6/2018. (SIB)
|
|
Filing
282
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the 280 Motion for Clarification is GRANTED to the extent it is necessary to reaffirm again the 274 Order issued on 8/24/18. The 281 Motion to Extend the Dispositive Motion Deadline by 25 days from this Court's ruling on the Motion for Clarification is GRANTED: dispositive motions deadline is extended to 11/9/18. There shall be no further extensions of time for filing dispositive motions. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 10/11/18. (BAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
